Thank you Benjamin ;-) Victor
Le 10 juin 2017 01:58, "Benjamin Peterson" <benja...@python.org> a écrit : > The reason we're having this conversation at all is probably a matter of > timing. If MemoryBIO was in Python 3 when PEP 466 was accepted, it surely > would have come along for the ride to 2.7. I believe PEP 466 is generally > considered to have produced positive results. PEP 546, carrying no breaking > changes, is less risky than PEP 466. > > The reluctance to bend 2.7 rules is healthy. This PEP is part of the price > we pay, though, for making a backwards-incompatible release. The security > landscape has and will change over the 10+ python-dev-supported life span > of 2.7. During that time, we have an obligation to keep Python 2 secure. > Part of that is supporting modern security interfaces, which are features. > This change is needed to make another stdlib feature, ensurepip (which is > itself yet another 2.7.x backport) work well. > > Therefore, as 2.7 release manager, I'm accepting the PEP. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > victor.stinner%40gmail.com > >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
