On 2017-07-27 01:07, Koos Zevenhoven wrote:
On Jul 27, 2017 02:38, "MRAB" <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com
<mailto:pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com>> wrote:
On 2017-07-26 23:55, Koos Zevenhoven wrote:
IMO,
for item in sequence:
# block
nobreak: # or perhaps `if not break:`
# block
would be clearer (if the syntax is necessary at all).
You couldn't have "if not break:" because that would look like the
start of an 'if' statement.
Do you mean as an implementation issue or for human readability?
I suppose you _could_ use "if not break:", but as 'if' normally
indicates the start of an 'if' statement, you would get complaints about
it! :-)
Maybe it would be clearer if it was "elif not break:". :-)
"nobreak" would introduce a new keyword, but "not break" wouldn't.
Sure :)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
