On 8 August 2017 at 10:12, Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> wrote: > I don't know whether it is beneficial or not - but having the capability to > build LTO without PGO seems reasonable. I can review any pull requests > altering configure.ac and Makefile.pre.in to make such a change.
Being able to separate them seems useful even if it's just from the performance research perspective of comparing "PGO only", "LTO only" and "PGO+LTO". The LTO only numbers may be of questionable relevance to us as CPython developers, but I can definitely see them being of interest to the folks working on C compiler toolchains. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
