On 8 August 2017 at 10:12, Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> wrote:
> I don't know whether it is beneficial or not - but having the capability to
> build LTO without PGO seems reasonable. I can review any pull requests
> altering configure.ac and Makefile.pre.in to make such a change.
Being able to separate them seems useful even if it's just from the
performance research perspective of comparing "PGO only", "LTO only"
The LTO only numbers may be of questionable relevance to us as CPython
developers, but I can definitely see them being of interest to the
folks working on C compiler toolchains.
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
Python-Dev mailing list