On Sat, Aug 19, 2017, 01:43 Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:33:27 -0400 > Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There are a few open questions left, namely the terminology > > and design of ContextKey API. On the former topic, I'm quite > > happy with the latest version: Execution Context, Logical > > Context, and Context Key. > > I don't really like it. "Logical Context" is vague (there are > lots of things called "context" in other libraries, so a bit of > specificity would help avoid confusion), and it's not clear what is > "logical" about it anyway. "Local Context" actually seemed better to > me (as it reminded of threading.local() or the general notion of > thread-local storage). > > I have to admit that I didn't even pick up on that name change. I could go either way. I do appreciate dropping ContextItem, though, because "CI" makes me think of continuous integration. And the overall shape of the API for public consumption LGTM. -brett > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
