On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivs...@gmail.com> wrote: > A question appeared here about a simple mental model for PEP 550. > It looks much clearer now, than in the first version, but I still would like > to clarify: can one say that PEP 550 just provides more fine-grained version > of threading.local(), that works not only per thread, but even per coroutine > within the same thread?
Simple model: 1. Values in the EC propagate down the call stack for both synchronous and asynchronous code. 2. For regular functions/code EC works the same way as threading.local(). Yury _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
