On Sep 7, 2017, at 07:46, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > Without following all this (or the PEP, yet) super exactly, does this mean > you are satisfied with what the PEP currently proposes or would you like > changes? It's a little unclear from what you wrote.
I’m also unsure whether Terry is good with the existing PEP or suggesting changes. > I think that's true for any IDE that has existing integrated debug > capabilities. However for every IDE I would hope that calling breakpoint() > will *also* break into the IDE's debugger. My use case is that sometimes I > have a need for a *conditional* breakpoint where it's just much simpler to > decide whether to break or not in Python code than it would be to use the > IDE's conditional breakpoint facilities. That certainly aligns with my own experience and expectations. I guess I’m a fellow old dog. :) -Barry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
