On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 22:15:01 -0400 Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm still not convinced that sharing synchronization primitives is > important enough to be worth including it in the PEP. It can be added > later, or via an extension module in the meantime. To that end, I'll > add a mechanism to the PEP for third-party types to indicate that they > can be passed through channels. Something like > "obj.__channel_support__ = True".
How would that work? If it's simply a matter of flipping a bit, why don't we do it for all objects? Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
