2017-10-24 11:22 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net>: > What does synchronization have to do with it? If synchronization > matters, then your PEP should be rejected, because current computers > using NTP can't synchronize with a better precision than 230 ns.
Currently, the PEP 564 is mostly designed for handling time on the same computer. Better resolution inside the same process, and "synchronization" between two processes running on the same host: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0564/#issues-caused-by-precision-loss Maybe tomorrow, time.time_ns() will help for use cases with more computers :-) > See https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-to-achieve-low-latency/ This article doesn't mention NTP, synchronization or nanoseconds. Where did you see "230 ns" for NTP? Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
