2017-11-04 0:44 GMT+01:00 Joao S. O. Bueno <jsbu...@python.org.br>:
> This just popped up in Brython's issue tracker discussion:
>
> """
> Pierre Quentel <notificati...@github.com>
>
> 04:57 (16 hours ago)
> to brython-dev/br., Subscribed
>
> I think it's better to rename all occurences of async now, although
> it's strange that :
>
> there is currently no deprecation warning in CPython with code that
> uses it as a variable name, PEP492 said that "async and await names
> will be softly deprecated in CPython 3.5 and 3.6"
> there is no mention of async and await becoming keywords in What's new
> in Python 3.7
>
> Maybe the idea was finally given up, but I can't find a reference.
async & await already became concrete keywords in Python 3.7:
$ ./python
Python 3.7.0a2+ (heads/master-dirty:cbe1756e3e, Nov 4 2017, 00:24:07)
>>> async=1
File "<stdin>", line 1
async=1
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Please request an entry in the "What's New in Pyhon 3.7" at
https://bugs.python.org/issue30406
Victor
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
