> On 5 Nov, 2017, at 6:29 PM, Oleg Broytman <p...@phdru.name> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 09:20:12PM -0500, Yury Selivanov 
> <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Big +1 from me.  The whole point of DeprecationWarnings is to be
>> visible
> 
> The whole point of DeprecationWarnings is to be visible to
> developers while in reality they will be visible to users -- and what
> the users would do with the warnings?

Complain to the authors and make them remove the issue.

https://github.com/requests/requests/issues/3954 
<https://github.com/requests/requests/issues/3954>
https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/sklearn-pandas/issues/76 
<https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/sklearn-pandas/issues/76>
https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/5824 
<https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/5824>
https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/472 
<https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/472>


+1 to re-enable this from me, too. At Facebook we are running unit tests and 
development builds with warnings. Just be aware that for some applications that 
will spew a lot. Python 3.6's warnings on invalid escapes is a big source of 
this.

- Ł

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to