On 10 November 2017 at 05:51, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > If we have to change the name I'd vote for string_annotations -- "lazy" has > too many other connotations (e.g. it might cause people to think it's the > thunks). I find str_annotations too abbreviated, and stringify_annotations > is too hard to spell.
Aye, I'd be fine with "from __future__ import string_annotations" - that's even more explicitly self-documenting than either of my suggestions. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
