2017-11-13 17:51 GMT+01:00 Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org>: > The main issue I have with `-b` is actually that you can get spurious > warnings about properly working code. You can also get warnings in > well-tested third-party libraries, e.g.: > > distributed/tests/test_client.py::test_get_versions > > /home/antoine/miniconda3/envs/dask36/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pandas/core/dtypes/common.py:20: > BytesWarning: Comparison between bytes and string > for t in ['O', 'int8', 'uint8', 'int16', 'uint16', > > /home/antoine/miniconda3/envs/dask36/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pandas/io/packers.py:231: > BytesWarning: Comparison between bytes and string > 7: np.dtype('int64'),
Oh right, that's a very good reason to not include -b option in the -X dev mode ;-) Usually, I mostly care of ResourceWarning and DeprecationWarning warnings. PYTHONMALLOC=debug and -X faulthandler just comes "for free", they don't change the behaviour as -b, and should help to debug crashes. --- By the way, My worst memory of BytesWarning is when implemented/fixed (I don't call) os.get_exec_path(): # {b'PATH': ...}.get('PATH') and {'PATH': ...}.get(b'PATH') emit a # BytesWarning when using python -b or python -bb: ignore the warning with warnings.catch_warnings(): warnings.simplefilter("ignore", BytesWarning) ... I really dislike this code since warnings.catch_warnings() is process-wide and so impact other threads :-( (Maybe Yury's PEP "context variables" would help here? ;-)) Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com