A note was added [1] about the solution for module only distributions and is live on Python.org.
[1] https://github.com/python/peps/pull/468 Ethan Smith On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Sebastian Rittau <srit...@rittau.biz> wrote: > Am 14.11.2017 um 02:38 schrieb Guido van Rossum: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Sebastian Rittau <srit...@rittau.biz> > wrote: > >> > >> I am really looking forward to the implementation of this PEP and I am >> glad that it is close to acceptance. One thing that is not really clear to >> me is how module-only packages are handled. Say I have a package "foo" that >> installs the file "foo.py" to site-packages, where would I install >> "foo.pyi" and py.typed to? Or is this case not supported and I have to >> convert the foo module into a package containing just __init__.py? >> > > Good call. I think that conversion to a package is indeed the best > approach -- it doesn't seem worth it to add more special-casing for this > scenario. > > Ethan, if you agree, you should just add a sentence about this to the PEP. > > This seems like the best solution, especially since setuptools does not > really support installing package data for pure modules. > > - Sebastian > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > ethan%40ethanhs.me > >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com