On 19 November 2017 at 17:22, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've updated the PEP to try to make the explanation of the historical > rationale more accurate: > https://github.com/python/peps/commit/30daada7867dd7f0e008545c7fd98612282ec602
With these changes, I think the version now live at https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0565/ is ready for pronouncement. Are you happy to review and pronounce on that in this thread, or would you prefer that I started a new one? Cheers, Nick. P.S. The actual implementation still needs some work, due to details of the dual Python/C warnings module implementation, and the subtleties of how that interacts with the re module. However, I've implemented a working version with a test case, and have a pretty clear idea of the extra test cases that we need to close some of the test coverage gaps that draft implementation has revealed. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
