On 23 November 2017 at 15:33, Stephen J. Turnbull < turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> However, my model of comprehensions is exactly a for loop that appends > to an empty list repeatedly, but doesn't leak iteration variables. Not since Python 3.0. Instead, they create a nested function, the same way generator expressions do (which is why the name resolution semantics are now identical between the two cases). The differences in structure between the four cases (genexp, list/set/dict comprehensions) then relate mainly to what the innermost loop does: result.append(expr) # list comp result.add(expr) # set comp result[k] = v # dict comp yield expr # genexp Thus, when the expression itself is a yield expression, you get: result.append(yield expr) # list comp result.add(yield expr) # set comp result[k] = (yield v) # dict comp yield (yield expr) # genexp Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com