The basics should be possible already with issue31800 <https://bugs.python.org/issue31800>, that said the issue you reference is to get a single function to parse it (without having to put the whole format), which would be neat.
I believe Paul Ganssle is planning on adding it to dateutil as well: https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/pull/489/files On 28 November 2017 at 19:51, Mike Miller <python-...@mgmiller.net> wrote: > This may have gotten bogged down again. Could we get the output of > datetime.isoformat() parsed at a minimum? Perfection is not required. > > Looks like there is a patch or two and test cases on the bug. > > -Mike > > > Could anyone put this five year-old bug about parsing iso8601 format >> date-times on the front burner? >> >> http://bugs.python.org/issue15873 >> >> In the comments there's a lot of hand-wringing about different variations >> that bogged it down, but right now I only need it to handle the output of >> datetime.isoformat(): >> >> >>> dt.isoformat() >> '2017-10-20T08:20:08.986166+00:00' >> >> Perhaps if we could get that minimum first step in, it could be iterated >> on and made more lenient in the future. >> >> _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/mariocj89 > %40gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
