On 12/8/2017 9:14 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Dec 7, 2017 12:49, "Eric V. Smith" <e...@trueblade.com <mailto:e...@trueblade.com>> wrote:

    The reason I didn't include it (as @dataclass(slots=True)) is
    because it has to return a new class, and the rest of the dataclass
    features just modifies the given class in place. I wanted to
    maintain that conceptual simplicity. But this might be a reason to
    abandon that. For what it's worth, attrs does have an
    @attr.s(slots=True) that returns a new class with __slots__ set.


They actually switched to always returning a new class, regardless of whether slots is set:

https://github.com/python-attrs/attrs/pull/260

In the end, it looks like that PR ended up just refactoring things, and the decision to always return a new class was deferred. I still haven't finished evaluating exactly what the refactoring does, though.

Eric.

You'd have to ask Hynek to get the full rationale, but I believe it was both for consistency with slot classes, and for consistency with regular class definition. For example, type.__new__ actually does different things depending on whether it sees an __eq__ method, so adding a method after the fact led to weird bugs with hashing. That class of bug goes away if you always set up the autogenerated methods and then call type.__new__.

They have a bunch of test cases that I'll have to review, too.

Eric.

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to