On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 at 07:30 Steve Holden <[email protected]> wrote:
> I submitted the 3.6 patch that Raymond committed. The purpose of the > change was to allow access to the ordering of the columns. > > It doesn't use any of the OrderedDict-only methods, and I'd be very > surprised if a reversion to using dict in 3.7 would cause any tests to fail. > But as Guido pointed out, the expected interface of what gets returned would be broken. I say just leave it as-is. -Brett > > regards > Steve > > Steve Holden > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 6:30 AM, 尚辉 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Since regular dicts are ordered in 3.7, it might be cleaner to returning >> regular dict instead of OrderedDict? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> > Unsubscribe: >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/steve%40holdenweb.com >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
