----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nick Coghlan" <ncogh...@redhat.com> > To: python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 7:57:21 AM > Subject: Re: Python 2.7 SSL upgrade patch available for testing > > On 08/07/2014 06:10 PM, Robert Kuska wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Nick Coghlan" <ncogh...@redhat.com> > >> On 07/30/2014 12:16 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > >>> So the question is, are we feeling lucky? :) I'd say yes, since rawhide > >>> has > >>> just recently become future Fedora 22 and not much is going on in there > >>> right now. If we break something, we can just revert it quickly and > >>> everything will be fine. > >>> > >>> Is someone strictly against this or shall I move on with patching our > >>> rawhide Python? > >> > >> Patching rawhide would be wonderful. The patch is at last passing > >> Python's own test suite, so it shouldn't have broken anything too > >> dramatically. > > > > I am willing to work on this starting next week (atm I am at flock), > > I will test it along with some ssl dependent packages. > > Did anyone get a chance to try this out?
Hi Nick, sorry for the delay. I did apply the patch, I have encountered seg fault in unicodeobject.c. Right now I am checking for diffs in upstream 2.7 branch between our unicodeobject.c and theirs. After that I will update the upstream bug report. > > Regards, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan > Red Hat Hosted & Shared Services > Software Engineering & Development, Brisbane > > HSS Provisioning Architect > _______________________________________________ > python-devel mailing list > python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel Regards, Robert Kuska ----------------------------------------------------- rkuska @ #fedora-devel on freenode #brno #gulag #software-collections on brq.redhat _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
