On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Miro Hrončok <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi, this looks very good.
>
> I tried to build some arched packages and was wondering, if there shouldn't
> be %{?_isa} included at the end of the provide name?
>
> Something like:
>
> Provided form the 64bit package:
>
> python3.5dist(foo)(x86-64)
> python3.5dist(foo)
>
>
> Provided form the 32bit package:
>
> python3.5dist(foo)
>
I'm not sure. Historically, dependency generators of this kind don't
include the architecture information because of the issues related to
determining whether a package is a noarch package or an archful
package (or if it needs to transition from one to the other). It's
somewhat easier to tell on 64-bit (due to path differences), but
harder on 32-bit, because the paths are the same.
I'm also not sure what happens when you just naively add %{?_isa} to a
Provides/Requires set in a noarch package.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
