On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:29:16AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:27:19PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 05:33 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> > Oh, Jerry beat me to it by taking a different route and disabling most > >> > test. That should work too, but I think it hides real problems with > >> > the python3 code... > >> > >> Yeah. Please don't just disable tests. Tests exist for a reason. > > > > We need to disable *some* tests, at least if we hope to build this > > quickly. It's just a question whether to disable more or less of > > them. > > > > Most tests fail because of sympy/pyglet/xvfb/opengl interaction > > (#904851), not from sympy error per se — the same tests run fine on a > > "real" display. > > Oh, sorry if I stepped on somebody's toes. i didn't realize others > were trying to fix sympy, too. I guess I should join the python SIG > mailing list, but I'm already on far too many mailing lists... No, no, there were no toes to step on. I didn't announce anywhere that I'm working on this. And anyway, I think our work is complementary: I didn't know about the patch you pulled in, but otoh, I managed to fix some of the tests by passing options to xvfb.
I'll try to push some of my changes too, let's see if that builds. > But I don't understand what you mean about me disabling tests. I > haven't disabled any tests, much less "most tests". i did add a BR on > pyglets, then discovered that that CAUSES test failures due to missing > GLX support, and so I removed the pyglets BR again. Maybe a BR on > mesa is needed as well as pyglets? I don't know. > > Anyway, I checked in an experimental patch in an attempt at fixing the > test failures, and now there is a different test failure. :-( So > either my experimental patch isn't good enough, or it works perfectly > and has unmasked another problem. I probably won't have time to > figure that out for a couple of days, so if somebody else is > interested in looking at it, here is the latest build failure: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=828867 Zbyszek _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
