>>>>> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> writes:
ZJ> This guidelines are just too vague, and I think this is the source ZJ> of many disagreements over naming. Well, there is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Libraries_and_Applications which I don't think is particularly vague. ZJ> I think we should stop guessing, and assume that if a package ZJ> installs any importable module, something might start using that ZJ> module and behave accordingly. Which is covered by the "Mixed Use Packages" section, isn't it? This question isn't unique to Python, which is why it's in the main packaging guidelines. If you believe that Python should be stricter here or has special requirements, then you can certainly propose some Python-specific guidelines. Languages which have more complete automatic dependency generation don't particularly need to care outside of the requirement to subpackage for purposes of dependency minimization. - J< _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
