On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 5:00 AM Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I finally got around to this mail...
>
> On 2020-04-19 16:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > As always, this leaves us with the name problem, but I'd very much like
> > to use %python_provides (note the s). The only problem I see is that it
> > is likely to be mistaken for the old one, but IMHO it shouldn't really
> > hurt that much.
>
> I guess something like %py_provides would also work, and maybe fit more
> nicely with the new generation of macros. Do you like full "python" prefix?
> But that's bikeshedding.
>

I know it's a bit of bikeshedding, but I think it's weird how
inconsistent we are with using py_* vs python_*. I'd rather us just
fully switch over to using python_* prefix everywhere.

It's annoying and I'd rather be verbose and clear rather than terse
and confusing.




--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to