On 6/5/20 2:22 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 2020-06-05 13:58, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On 6/5/20 1:43 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 05. 06. 20 11:51, Tomas Orsava wrote:
[...]
I see what you mean.
On the other hand, that's a pretty horrible error message format
(posting in it's entirety for others to consider).
Is there no better way to achieve this? For a few packages it's ok,
but I would be weary of introducing this to too many packages.
In the proposal there's talk of blocking the name on PyPI. Is this
the way the blocking will be achieved?
You can talk to PyPI admins to block packages.
But all in all, I think what "fedora", "ldap" or "microsoft are doing
is the best option right now.
I started some discussion upstream, if you want to read it:
https://discuss.python.org/t/pypi-as-a-project-repository-vs-name-registry-a-k-a-pypi-namesquatting-e-g-for-fedora-packages/4045/2
(But let's discuss Fedora issues here first.)
Ah, that's sad. Thanks for raising the topic upstream, hopefully it'll
improve down the road.
As fer Fedora: Do I understand it correctly that:
- the names of Python packages in Fedora have been now blocked on PyPI
using the admin intervention, and
- we want to advise people to get those names on PyPI and either publish
the projects there or do this fedora/ldap-sort of namesquatting?
I agree it's the least-worst option now. However, it will need a
detailed instructions.
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
