On 23. 11. 21 20:26, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 07:13:19PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The files are not supposed to be in the package. It could lead to
conflicts, as you can see.
Thanks. Is this is a common test artifact which could "leak" in other
pacages, and there maybe a standard CI check (or gate?) we could put in
place? Or is it just a coincidence that both packages made a similarly-named
mistake?
It is a mistake that I'Ve seen again and again over the years. Upstream Python
packaging is somewhat immune to this problem (pip will happily override files
like this), so it usually only turns into a problem when packaged as RPM.
Yes, it is possible to check this automatically. For instance, I believe
rpmlint >= 2 does it.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
