On 16-05-2023 15:56, Maxwell G wrote:
On Tue May 16, 2023 at 13:15 +0200, Sandro wrote:
Did I misunderstand/misinterpret the guidelines? The review is currently
stalled due to the PyPI parity issue.
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188653
I didn't mean to hold up the package on this. It should be fixed, but I
don't consider this issue a blocker. I just didn't have time to complete
a full review myself 😅, so I left a drive by comment and didn't assign
it to myself or set the fedora-review? flag. I'll try to take a look
later.
Then we may have misunderstood each other. No worries. It happens.
Language barriers and all.
I'll update the bug with new links later today. I somehow decided with
the pending publication on PyPI (see elsewhere in this thread) it'd be
better to name the package python-vkbasalt-cli with an extra provides
for vkbasalt-cli. The same approach I/we chose for python-fvs.
Thanks again for reviewing that by the way.
-- Sandro
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
