While I was reviewing python-pypdf [1] I noticed that the produced rpm
(python3-pypdf) does not contain the license file, that is "rpm -q
--licensefiles" comes up empty.
As far as I can tell the package follows the example spec file [2] which does
not feature an explicit %license tag so I guess the %pyproject macros are
supposed to pick these up automatically?
As for python-pypdf, the license file IS present in Python's dist-info
directory.
The release tarball uses pyproject.toml with the following line:
license = { file = "LICENSE" }
Am I misunderstanding something here or could this be a shortcoming in the
current macros?
Felix
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279080
[2]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_example_spec_file
--
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
