On Wednesday, March 12th, 2025 at 00:11, Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> 
wrote:

> Hello packagers.
> 
> As a followup to this email sent a month ago to the python-devel list, I now
> plan to make the incorrect (and unsafe) usage of %pyproject_buildrequires 
> -t/-e
> and %tox without a suitable tox configuration fail the build.
> 
> This is a breaking change, but I believe it's the only way to prevent packages
> with always passing %checks.
> 
> If your package has no tox configuration, do not use the -t/-e option for
> %pyproject_buildrequires, do not use %tox.
> 
> This change will land to rawhide first and later to all stable releases as 
> well.
> 
> For reference:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/pull-request/512
> 
> On 05. 02. 25 10:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> 
> > Hello Pythonistas.
> > 
> > When we updated tox from version 3 to 4, it no longer fails when here is no
> > suitable tox configuration found. This was a deliberate upstream choice.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, it means that packages that use %pyproject_buildrequires 
> > with -t
> > or -e now silently succeed if there is no tox configuration found.
> > 
> > I identified 95 packages that are affected by this, see below.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, it is tricky to detect a missing tox configuration directly 
> > from
> > %pyproject_buildrequires. For now, I did this by looking for a specific
> > information in tox output, but that might not be stable.
> > 
> > I built all Rawhide packages matching %\{?pyproject_buildrequires\s+(.+\s)?-
> > \S*[te] in a copr with a modified version of %pyproject_buildrequires which
> > fails when this happens.
> > 
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/pyproject-buildrequires-no-
> > tox-error/builds/
> > 
> > For all the failures, I looked into the logs and identified the 95 failures 
> > are
> > caused by that (see below).
> > 
> > If this affects your package, please consider if your usage of -t/-e for
> > %pyproject_buildrequires is a mistake (and remove it), or see if some 
> > explicit
> > build dependencies are missing (and the package only builds by chance).
> > 
> > Sometimes, upstreams which use tox don't put their tox configuration into 
> > sdist
> > (%pypi_source) and only keep it in git.
> > 
> > Sometimes, upstreams don't use tox at all and the usage of -t/-e is wrong.
> > 
> > If you have questions, I am happy to help.
> > 
> > Maintainers by package:
> > patool eclipseo
> > eclipseo patool python-towncrier scancode-toolkit
> 
> 
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok

This should be fixed in patool 4.0.0

Best regards

--
Robert-André Mauchin
FAS: eclipseo

-- 
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to