Hello Daniel, Daniel Drake [2012-09-25 11:24 -0600]: > Similarly, I am forced to provide a user_data parameter in my callback > function to receive the value that was passed, otherwise python throws > an exception about the callback receiving the wrong number of > arguments. > > Is this the intended behaviour, or is there a bug somewhere?
It's intended. In general GI does not make any argument optional; some are provided by pygobject itself, such as self and GDestroyNotifys, but not others. There might be some overrides which make the user_data argument optional for backwards compatibility reasons, but it's not the common case. Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) _______________________________________________ python-hackers-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/python-hackers-list
