On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 4:54 PM Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm firmly of the opinion that this should not change. Code clarity is > not helped by creating a brand-new "character" type and not having a > corresponding literal for it, and the one obvious literal, given the > amount of prior art using it, would be some form of quote character - > probably the apostrophe. Since that's not available, I think a > character type would be a major hurdle to get over. It's possible (though not so pretty or obvious) to use $a for the character "a". ~Elazar
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
