Ken Kundert writes: > The rule is you cannot give unit without a scale factor, and the > unity scale factor is _, so if you wanted to say 1 mol you would > use 1_mol. 1mol means one milli ol. These look a little strange, > but that is because the use they unit scale factor, which is the > one that is currently not in heavy use.
One reason I like Python is that it has relatively few of these irregularities and ambiguities (in comparison to other languages and non-programming contexts with similar usage). For me, that counts against this proposal. BTW, where is "_" used as the unit scale prefix? > I suggest that we do not support the h (=100), da (=10), d (=0.1), > or c (=0.01) scale factors. I don't think it's reasonable to exclude those. Around me, cm, dB, and ha (centimeters, decibels, and hectares) are in common use. What happened to "support with a capital S"? I don't speak for anybody but myself, but I think this proposal has gotten less interesting/acceptable with each post. I'm going wait and see if the "units are types" approach goes anywhere. I think it's probably the only one that has wings, but that's because it requires no change to the language. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
