On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for accepting the PEP! Will focus on the implementation now.
You're welcome! Good luck with the implementation. @Nick, regarding the suggestion to use [<expr> for <var> in async <iterable>] instead of [<expr> async for <var> in <iterable>] I think the lack of grammaticality is actually a feature -- we don't want people to confuse `async <iterable>` with `await <iterable>`. Python has no other postfix syntax like this (unless you count f(), d[k] or x.a as postfix) so I don't think people are likely to mistake this for an 'async' postfix on <expr> rather than a prefix on 'for'. Hopefully they've seen an 'async for' statement before they encounter an async comprehension. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
