On 4 October 2016 at 08:18, Erik <pyt...@lucidity.plus.com> wrote: > The expression suggested could be spelled: > > for i in range(10): if i != 5: > body > > So, if a colon followed by another suite is equivalent to the same construct > but without the INDENT (and then the corresponding DEDENT unwinds up to the > point of the first keyword) then we get something that's pretty much as > succinct as Dominik suggested.
What's the pay-off though? The ultimate problem with deeply nested code isn't the amount of vertical whitespace it takes up - it's the amount of working memory it requires in the brain of a human trying to read it. "This requires a lot of lines and a lot of indentation" is just an affordance at time of writing that reminds the code author of the future readability problem they're creating for themselves. Extracting named chunks solves the underlying readability problem by reducing the working memory demand in reading the code (assuming the chunks are well named, so the reader can either make a useful guess about the purpose of the extracted piece without even looking at its documentation, or at least remember what it does after looking it up the first time they encounter it). By contrast, eliminating the vertical whitespace without actually reducing the level of nesting is merely hiding the readability problem without actually addressing it. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
