On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rene Nejsum <r...@stranden.com> wrote: >> On 04 Oct 2016, at 02:09, Stephen J. Turnbull >> <turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: >> >> Rene Nejsum writes: >>> I believe that you should be able to code concurrent code, without >>> being to explicit about it, but let the runtime handle low-level >>> timing, as long as you know your code will execute in the intended >>> order. >> >> Isn't "concurrent code whose order of execution you know" an oxymoron? > > You are right, I should have been more specific. What I ment was that I don’t > need code filled with async/await, I don’t care where it blocks, as long as > it (the specific code block iI am looking at) runs in the order i wrote it :-) >
Then you want threads. Easy! ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
