On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:31:22PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> By contrast, eliminating the vertical whitespace without actually
> reducing the level of nesting is merely hiding the readability problem
> without actually addressing it.
+1
Extra newlines are cheap. Writing
for x in expression:
if condition:
block
is a simple, clean idiom that is easy to understand, avoids a number of
pitfalls (where do you put the elif or else if you need one?), and only
costs one extra line and one extra indent. If you have so many indents
that this is a problem, that's a code smell and you ought to think more
closely about what you are doing.
There's another variation that saves an indent for the cost of one more
line:
for x in expression:
if not condition:
continue
block
In contrast, comprehensions are a single expression and are expected to
usually be written in one line, although that's often hard to do without
very long lines. They cannot include elif or else clauses, so avoid
that particular pitfall. But the "very long line" problem shows that
they are too dense: simple examples look fine:
[x+1 for x in seq if cond]
but in practice, they're often much longer with a much higher density of
code:
[default if obj is None else obj.method(arg) for (obj, count) in
zip(values, counts) if count > 1]
Some compromise on the optimal level of readability and code density is
allowed: that's the price we pay in order to squeeze everything into a
single expression. But that is not something we ought to copy when we
have the luxury of a suite of statements.
--
Steve
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
