On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:06 AM Neil Girdhar <mistersh...@gmail.com> wrote: <snip>
> Regarding Steven's example, like Sven, I also see it this way: > > [*t for t in [(1, 'a'), (2, 'b'), (3, 'c')]] > > should mean: > > [*(1, 'a'), *(2, 'b'), *(3, 'c')]] > > Which coincides with what the OP is asking for. > <snip> > >From a CPython implementation standpoint, we specifically blocked this code > path, and it is only a matter of unblocking it if we want to support this. > > This is *very, very* not surprising. And should be stressed. Elazar
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
