I think that replying with an almost canned response, like the one Ned
proposed ("unless you are seriously proposing a change to the language,
this is not the right list."), would help discourage other list members
from responding where responses aren't necessary.

-Ryan Birmingham

On 10 January 2017 at 16:58, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:

> Whether the intent was to annoy or just to provoke, the effect was dozens
> of messages with people falling over each other trying to engage the OP,
> who clearly was ignorant of most language design issues and uninterested in
> learning, and threw some insults in for good measure. The respondents
> should have known better.
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to