On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Thomas Kluyver <tho...@kluyver.me.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> * What would the __name__ be? In "def ham.spam():", is the name "spam" >> or "ham.spam"? Or say you have "def x[0]():" - is the name "x[0]" or >> something else? > > I'd say 'spam' in the first case, and a special value like '<unnamed > function>' in the latter. You already can't rely on __name__ being a > usable name in arbitrary callables: > > x[0] = lambda: 0 > x[0].__name__ == '<lambda>'
And this is exactly why this wants a PEP - to collect decisions and arguments on all of these bikesheds. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
