On 12 February 2017 at 22:29, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > However, even with that, I'm still only +0 on the idea - if folks > really want it, `types.new_class` can already be used to creatively to > address most of these things, and it's not exactly a problem that > comes up very often in practice.
I'll also note that much of what I'm talking about there could be exposed as a types.bind_descriptor() function that implemented the various adjustments (rebinding __class__ references is tricky though, since the function with a bound closure variable might be hidden inside another descriptor, like property) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
