On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:09:39AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 14 April 2017 at 04:20, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > > Long ago, when the operator module was first introduced, there was a > > much stronger correspondence between the operator.__dunder__ functions > > and dunder methods. But I think that correspondence is now so weak that > > we should simply treat it as a historical artifact. > > +1 from me, with this rationale. The specifics sounds pretty good to > me, too - happy to review a PR if you put one together :)
http://bugs.python.org/issue30085 For some reason, Github won't allow me to log in at the moment. It keeps insisting I need to enable cookies, even though I have. Perhaps it doesn't like my browser? I'll have to try on another computer with a different browser. Terry, you had some nice suggestions for wording. If you want to submit a PR, feel free to take over the issue. I probably won't get a chance to do any more on this for a week. -- Steve _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
