If this is the *only* objection to attrs let me quote some documentation: """ If playful naming turns you off, attrs comes with serious business aliases:
>>> from attr import attrs, attrib >>> @attrs ... class SeriousCoordinates(object): ... x = attrib() ... y = attrib() """ So attrs and attrib can be used as alternatives for attr.s and attr.ib . Personally, I like the playful names. Stephan 2017-05-17 19:39 GMT+02:00 Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de>: > On 17.05.2017 19:30, Ethan Furman wrote: >> >> Given that one of Python's great strengths is its readability, I would not >> use the attr library in teaching because it is not. Having a dot in the >> middle of words is confusing, especially when you don't already have a basis >> for which abbreviations are common. Is it attr.ib or att.rib or at.trib? > > > It took me 5 days to see "foo = attrib()" in "foo = attr.ib()".... What the > hell means "ib"? ... > > Sven > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
