On 17 May 2017 at 20:09, Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de> wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > On 17.05.2017 08:49, Stephan Houben wrote: > >> 2. Not subclassed from tuple. I have been bitten by this subclassing >> when trying to set up >> singledispatch on sequences and also on my classes. >> > > Would it make sense to have a 'simpleobject'? Which basically implements a > NamedTuple constructor but nothing more? > > class Foo(simpleobject): > attribute1: User > attribute2: Blog > attribute3: list > > > And if you need more __dunder__ magic, have it provided by some mixins? > > > class Foo(dictlike, tuplelike, simpleobject): > attribute1: User > attribute2: Blog > attribute3: list > > def __my_dunder__(self): > ... >
As I understand this is more or less what is proposed, the idea is to write it into a PEP and consider API/corner cases/implementation/etc. -- Ivan
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
