On 26 June 2017 at 10:25, Rob Cliffe <rob.cli...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 25/06/2017 12:58, Markus Meskanen wrote:
>>
>> I'm a huge fan of the do...while loop in other languages, and it would
>> often be useful in Python too, when doing stuff like:
>>
>> while True:
>> password = input()
>> if password == ...:
>> break
>>
>> [...]I suggest [...]
>>
>> do:
>> password = input('Password: ')
>> until password == secret_password
>>
>> # This line only gets printed if until failed
>> print('Invalid password, try again!')
>>
>>
> I don't see any significant advantage in providing an extra Way To Do It.
> Granted, the "while True" idiom is an idiosyncrasy, but it is frequently
> used and IMHO intuitive and easy to get used to. Your suggestion doesn't
> even save a line of code, given that you can write:
>
> while True:
> password = input('Password:')
> if password == secret_password: break
> print('Invalid password, try again!')
Right, this is the key challenge for do-while loops in Python: can you
come up with something that's significantly clearer than the current
"while True/if/break" pattern?
The biggest weakness of that idiom is that it isn't really explicit in
the header line - there's nothing about "while True:" that directly
tells the reader "This loop is expected to exit via a break
statement".
If we wanted to allow that to be expressed literally, we could
probably special case the "while not break" keyword sequence as a do
loop:
while not break:
# Setup
if condition: break
# Loop continuation
That more explicit declaration of intent ("The code in the loop body
will conditionally break out of this loop") would allow a couple of
things:
- the compiler could warn that an else clause attached to such a loop
will never execute (technically it could do that for any expression
that resolves to `True` as a constant)
- code linters could check the loop body for a break statement and
complain if they didn't see one
Logically, it's exactly the same as writing "while True:", but whereas
that spelling suggests "infinite loop", the "while not break:"
spelling would more directly suggest "terminated inside the loop body
via a break statement"
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
