> Its the applications where it *is* important that > we should be looking at.
Um, yes, but given our relative positions in this debate, the onus is not really on *me* to demonstrate such an application, right? That would just confuse everbody ;-) (FWIW, Sagemath is not mostly "numerical processing", it is mostly *symbolic* calculations and involves a lot of complex algorithms and datastructures, including sequences.) Stephan 2017-06-27 13:48 GMT+02:00 Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info>: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:32:05PM +0200, Stephan Houben wrote: >> Hi Steven, >> >> To put this into perspective, I did some greps on Sagemath, >> being the largest Python project I have installed on this machine >> (1955 .py files). > > And one which is especially focused on numerical processing, not > really the sort of thing that does a much iterator chaining. That's > hardly a fair test -- we know there are applications where chaining is > not important at all. Its the applications where it *is* important that > we should be looking at. > > > -- > Steve > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
