On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:07 PM Lukasz Langa <luk...@langa.pl> wrote:
> This is off topic for discussion of this PEP. > > It would require another one (essentially an extension of PEP 484) to get > passed for your idea to be standardized. > I'm not sure whether this is directed to me; so just to make it clear, I did not propose anything here. I will be happy for PEP 563 to be accepted as is, although the implications of the ability to customize Python's scoping/binding rules are worth mentioning in the PEP, regardless of whether these are considered a pro or a con. Elazar
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
