It could be: time.time(ns=True) On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, that's an in-joke. Koos is expressing his disappointment in the > rejection of PEP 555 in a way that's only obvious if you're Dutch. > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Steven D'Aprano <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 08:04:25PM +0300, Koos Zevenhoven wrote: >> > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > I'd like to have time.time_ns() -- this is most parallel to >> st_mtime_ns. >> > > >> > > >> > Welcome to the list Guido! You sound like a C programmer. For many >> people, >> > that was the best language they knew of when they learned to program. >> But >> > have you ever tried Python? You should give it a try! >> >> You seem to be making a joke, but I have *no idea* what the joke is. >> >> Are you making fun of Guido's choice of preferred name? "time_ns" >> instead of "time_nanoseconds" perhaps? >> >> Other than that, I cannot imagine what the joke is about. Sorry for >> being so slow. >> >> >> -- >> Steve >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-ideas mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas >> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >> > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > > -- Juancarlo *Añez*
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
