On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 November 2017 at 17:43, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > >> There seem to be some action items from this thread that I haven't seen >> reflected in the PEP source code yet. >> [...snip...] >> Then the next step I propose is a PR with a full implementation. After >> that I'll likely approve the PEP (or we'll have minor feedback based on >> trying the implementation). >> > > Yes, sorry, I wanted to make updates to the PEP and reference > implementation, > but last two weeks were very busy. > Hopefully, I will work on it this weekend. > Thanks, I am happy now with the PEP, except for one detail: maybe `__mro_entry__` should always return a tuple and then maybe renamed to `__mro_entries__`. (See debate at https://github.com/python/peps/pull/460#issuecomment-343969528 .) Other than that I think we just need to satisfy a process nit: let's post the final PEP (after that issue is resolved) to python-dev. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
