On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I like the idea in principle, but highlighting a particular backwards > compatibility pain point: one of the complications in importlib is that we > promise to keep the "sys.modules[__name__] = some_other_object" idiom > working. That means the need to do that check exists regardless of whether > importlib is passing the module itself around, or the module's dict. > > > Another point, perhaps more difficult to address: Would for instance globals() then return a module instead of a dict/mapping? ––Koos -- + Koos Zevenhoven + http://twitter.com/k7hoven +
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
