2017-11-28 10:06 GMT+03:00 C Anthony Risinger <c...@anthonyrisinger.com>:
> > If not already considered, what if the RHS had to be explicitly unpacked? > > Something like: > > a, b, c = *iterator > > Which would essentially be: > > a, b, c = (*iterator,) > > This enables lazy assignment by default but `*` can force complete > expansion (and exact matching) of the RHS. > While I find your suggestions very close to my vision and the initial proposal, which I still like. I saw enough of the discussion to realize that by now it is already impossible. > It's a breaking change, but it does have a straightforward fix (simply > wrap and unpack any relevant RHS > Although I have never used Python 2, the idea to distinguish fixed-sized and something lazy, even for Python 4, reminds me of the transition from str-unicode to the present state of affairs, but with much higher impact.To be honest, I do not like some aspects of how Python 2 issue has been resolved (especially bytes part) but it is another topic. With kind regards, -gdg
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
