On Thu, Jan 11, 2018, at 17:41, Victor Stinner wrote: > I like the idea of having a fully qualified name that "works" (can be > resolved). > > I don't think that repr() should change, right?
What if we made these types available under their current name in the types module? e.g. types.module, types.function, etc. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
